ICS 2023_Q4(OCT-DEC)

2023/12/18

  • Franke, C., Groeppel-Klein, A., & Müller, K. (2023). Consumers’ responses to virtual influencers as advertising endorsers: novel and effective or uncanny and deceiving?. Journal of Advertising, 52(4), 523-539.［ppt］［pdf］
  • Zhang, Y., & Gosline, R. (2023). Human favoritism, not AI aversion: People’s perceptions (and bias) toward generative AI, human experts, and human–GAI collaboration in persuasive content generation. Judgment and Decision Making, 18, e41.［ppt］［pdf］

2023/12/11

2023/12/04

  • Baek, T. H., & Kim, M. (2023). Is ChatGPT scary good? How user motivations affect creepiness and trust in generative artificial intelligence. Telematics and Informatics, 83, 102030.［ppt］［pdf］
  • Stanton, C. J., & Stevens, C. J. (2017). Don’t stare at me: the impact of a humanoid robot’s gaze upon trust during a cooperative human–robot visual task. International Journal of Social Robotics, 9, 745-753.［ppt］［pdf］
  • Stein, J. P., Linda Breves, P., & Anders, N. (2022). Parasocial interactions with real and virtual influencers: The role of perceived similarity and human-likeness. New Media & Society, 14614448221102900.［ppt］［pdf］

2023/11/27

  • Choung, H., David, P., & Ross, A. (2023). Trust in AI and Its Role in the Acceptance of AI Technologies. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(9), 1727-1739.［ppt］［pdf］
  • Chen, F. S., Minson, J. A., Schöne, M., & Heinrichs, M. (2013). In the eye of the beholder: Eye contact increases resistance to persuasion. Psychological science, 24(11), 2254-2261.［ppt］［pdf］
  • Jin, S. V. (2023). “To comply or to react, that is the question:” the roles of humanness versus eeriness of AI-powered virtual influencers, loneliness, and threats to human identities in AI-driven digital transformation. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 1(2), 100011.［ppt］［pdf］

2023/11/20

  • Rubo, M., & Gamer, M. (2021). Stronger reactivity to social gaze in virtual reality compared to a classical laboratory environment. British Journal of Psychology, 112(1), 301-314.［ppt］［pdf］
  • Borau, S., Otterbring, T., Laporte, S., & Fosso Wamba, S. (2021). The most human bot: Female gendering increases humanness perceptions of bots and acceptance of AI. Psychology & Marketing, 38(7), 1052-1068.［ppt］［pdf］

2023/11/13

  • Peña, J., Khan, S., & Alexopoulos, C. (2016). I am what I see: How avatar and opponent agent body size affects physical activity among men playing exergames. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(3), 195-209.［ppt］［pdf］
  • Sheeran, P., & Webb, T. L. (2016). The intention–behavior gap. Social and personality psychology compass, 10(9), 503-518.［ppt］［pdf］
  • Mirowska, A., & Arsenyan, J. (2023). Sweet escape: The role of empathy in social media engagement with human versus virtual influencers. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 174, 103008.［ppt］［pdf］

2023/10/16

  • Longoni, C., & Cian, L. (2022). Artificial intelligence in utilitarian vs. hedonic contexts: The “word-of-machine” effect. Journal of Marketing, 86(1), 91-108.［ppt］［pdf］
  • Yu, J., Dickinger, A., So, K. K. F., & Egger, R. (2024). Artificial intelligence-generated virtual influencer: Examining the effects of emotional display on user engagement. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 76, 103560.［ppt］［pdf］
  • Shin, D. (2018). Empathy and embodied experience in virtual environment: To what extent can virtual reality stimulate empathy and embodied experience?. Computers in human behavior, 78, 64-73.［ppt］［pdf］

2023/10/09

  • Thomas, V. L., & Fowler, K. (2021). Close encounters of the AI kind: Use of AI influencers as brand endorsers. Journal of Advertising, 50(1), 11-25.［ppt］［pdf］